Given the distinction you made between systematic and rational, there might be a good discussion about reasonable (or informal) systems and how they can effectively lead to more formal rationality. I think a lot of people find rationality intimidating but find systems useful and that can be a gateway for them.
Maybe it would be worthwhile to introduce a proper term for the analogue of rationality in the relational and emotional domain. I feel that there should be such a term. Thereafter one could introduce its meta-term for how this domain plays out in stage 5. In this scheme, where it is taken as granted that domains may lag, meta-rationality would then be the proper term only for the cognitive part of stage 5.
Thanks! We've used "systematicity" and "meta-systematicity" to cover all domains. But I agree that having ones specifically for the relational and emotional domains would be helpful, if they gave a sense of what that's about.
How about endowing the domain words with suffixes like -nomy, -ics or -nomics? For example relationomy, relatics/relationics or relationomics. I think I like the last one best. Feels the most systemic to me.
Love these! I'd want more and LONGER ones, haha 😁♥️
Given the distinction you made between systematic and rational, there might be a good discussion about reasonable (or informal) systems and how they can effectively lead to more formal rationality. I think a lot of people find rationality intimidating but find systems useful and that can be a gateway for them.
Thank you! I really enjoy your posts.
Maybe it would be worthwhile to introduce a proper term for the analogue of rationality in the relational and emotional domain. I feel that there should be such a term. Thereafter one could introduce its meta-term for how this domain plays out in stage 5. In this scheme, where it is taken as granted that domains may lag, meta-rationality would then be the proper term only for the cognitive part of stage 5.
Thanks! We've used "systematicity" and "meta-systematicity" to cover all domains. But I agree that having ones specifically for the relational and emotional domains would be helpful, if they gave a sense of what that's about.
How about endowing the domain words with suffixes like -nomy, -ics or -nomics? For example relationomy, relatics/relationics or relationomics. I think I like the last one best. Feels the most systemic to me.
Really fascinating
based, very based.
Love these conversations!