7 Comments
User's avatar
Christofer Lövgren's avatar

Love these! I'd want more and LONGER ones, haha 😁♥️

Expand full comment
nope's avatar

Given the distinction you made between systematic and rational, there might be a good discussion about reasonable (or informal) systems and how they can effectively lead to more formal rationality. I think a lot of people find rationality intimidating but find systems useful and that can be a gateway for them.

Expand full comment
BS's avatar

Really fascinating

Expand full comment
Stefan Brink's avatar

Thank you! I really enjoy your posts.

Maybe it would be worthwhile to introduce a proper term for the analogue of rationality in the relational and emotional domain. I feel that there should be such a term. Thereafter one could introduce its meta-term for how this domain plays out in stage 5. In this scheme, where it is taken as granted that domains may lag, meta-rationality would then be the proper term only for the cognitive part of stage 5.

Expand full comment
David Chapman's avatar

Thanks! We've used "systematicity" and "meta-systematicity" to cover all domains. But I agree that having ones specifically for the relational and emotional domains would be helpful, if they gave a sense of what that's about.

Expand full comment
Maya's avatar

based, very based.

Expand full comment
Andrew Conner's avatar

Love these conversations!

Expand full comment