Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ondřej Kupka's avatar

I have to say, what a feat, trying to explain deity practice to people.

When I encountered this practice, it changed my life completely. But I had more luck than I was being reasonable. I went for a retreat introducing such a practice without knowing much, fortunately having accumulated the important preliminary insights into emptiness, the three characteristics and what not. Also the practical skills like just resting in awareness from my previous interest in Dzogchen. Without all this I have no idea how that retreat would have played out for me. But perhaps it just lead to me integrating all the material I've personally accumulated, it was the right thing at the right moment.

But anyway, what I basically wanted to say, it cannot be overestimated how much this practice is about embodiment and relating. About just relating from certain place. And this is indeed what the practice does for me. I also see all the difficulties people from the West must have trying to understand it conceptually. This is an entirely wrong way to try to grasp it, although there is that need naturally. Why should I invest the time? You don't know and you cannot know until you taste it. The idea is, go to a certain place, relate from there, dwell there. Or that is my understanding. When you rest in emptiness, cease being yourself, and then you arise as the deity from the place of compassion, it is a moment when the whole world is lit. The intensity is almost unbearable. Fortunately, there is nobody that has to bear it :-)

It reminds me of a saying from Shantideva's Guide to the Bodhisattva’s Way of Life: When bodhicitta is born, it is like a flash of lightning on a dark night that illuminates everything. It is like reliving this moment again and again, until you just become a living manifestation of all of what the path is. Can't speak for others, but so far I haven't really found anything more meaningful, but that is also because my values are very much in sync with this path.

Expand full comment
John Baometrus's avatar

Really explains so much about the Mormon/LDS faith. In our temples, it’s “endowment” rather than empowerment. And the names and forms of the various gods/figures/angels are taken to be real and external, and practice assumes they are such. But what is visualized and what is aspired to is relatively directed and focused.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts